Free Shipping Over $55
      

Carhartt 100681

Carhartt Women's Kane Double Front Sandstone Duck Relaxed Fit Pant

Reg Price: $54.99
Now: $44.99

Loading Selection...











Carhartt Logo
 

•  12-ounce, 100% cotton sandstone duck
•  Relaxed Fit
•  Mid rise, sits just below the waist
•  Straight leg
•  Contoured waistband prevents gapping in the back
•  Utility pockets
•  Utility loop
•  Utility band
•  Double front
•  Triple-stitched inseams
•  Short inseam - 30"
•  Regular inseam - 32"
•  Tall inseam - 34"
•  Imported
•  Replaces WB136
 
Product reviews
Rated 2.9 out of 5 by 36 reviewers
Very Low
Quality
Very High
Quality
Runs
Small
Runs
Large
Very
Uncomfortable
Very
Comfortable
Not
Durable
Very
Durable
1 / 5
Agree that the new design stinks!!
November 22, 2016

From: Kintnersville, PA Age: 45-54 Gender: Female
I am so disappointed in the new design. I thought that since the pants were mostly cotton that i could shrink it to size but no. The waist and legs have way too much room and I even got a smaller size that I thought would of been too small. I extremely disappointed. I am sorry I didn’t look at the reviews online but unfortunately I ordered them from my jean store that i respected and ensured me that they would be the same. Don’t waste your money. I am now searching for someone I know that may be able to use them. Waste of money!! My rating would of been negative if there was that option.
Runs
Small
Runs
Large
Very
Uncomfortable
Very
Comfortable
Very Low
Quality
Very High
Quality
Not
Durable
Very
Durable
Written by a customer while visiting Carhartt.com
5 / 5
Love these pants!
October 26, 2016

From: , OR Age: 45-54 Gender: Female
While these do run large, the quality and comfort is fantastic. I work outside all day and these more than fit the bill of what I need
Runs
Small
Runs
Large
Very
Uncomfortable
Very
Comfortable
Very Low
Quality
Very High
Quality
Not
Durable
Very
Durable
Written by a customer while visiting Carhartt.com
5 / 5
Run larger than I anticipated
October 6, 2016

From: Reno, NV Age: 55-65 Gender: Female
This is my second pair of Carhartts of this style. It is really difficult to find petite sizes in work pants and these fit the bill. Other reviews mentioned that they run large, but for working I need them roomy. However, these are roomy enough to need a size smaller. I thought they would shrink, but they didn't shrink that much. If you needed heavy duty pants for outdoor work these are what you need.
Runs
Small
Runs
Large
Very
Uncomfortable
Very
Comfortable
Very Low
Quality
Very High
Quality
1 / 5
just like everybody else, the new design sucks
August 6, 2016

From: Vancouver, WA Age: 25-34 Gender: Female
As a woman working in trades I have become extremely dissapointed in any socalled workpants for women. Not only is there a very small selection available but either the fit is uncomfortable or as in many cases you either don't have or dared to discontinue the tall sizes as well. I have already emailed the CEO of Dickies but the only response I got is I should check out the great womans section after requesting a mens design to be made into a womans, so needless to say either your design team of womans fashion either consists of men or your models are short with a tomboy figure. The real issue I believe is the fact that the majority of us women resort to buying mens work-pants as the only alternative that you do not prioritize because your salefigures are so small thinking there is no demand for them, no I do not understand in any way why you you think any tightfitting pants are work apropriate in any way, my dresscode requires me to wear loosefitting clothes so I do not get the negative attention from co-workers/customers aka sexual harassment because the pants are skinnyfit. your entire womans section is not working Either do a complete redesign or an overhaul of your designteam!!!
Very
Uncomfortable
Very
Comfortable
Very Low
Quality
Very High
Quality
Not
Durable
Very
Durable
Written by a customer while visiting Carhartt.com
1 / 5
A poor replacement
April 3, 2016

From: Age: 35-44 Gender: Female
I loved the previous style of these trousers, the WB 136. Amazing, comfortably and extremely durable. The perfect work pant. And I have no idea why Carhartt discontinued it and replaced it with these. The fit is awful. They have added 2+" to the circumference of the leg! Why I don't know but its like wearing exaggerated bellbottoms. Useless in a work pant. The WB 136 was perfect and I wish they would bring that model back.
Not
Durable
Very
Durable
Written by a customer while visiting Carhartt.com
5 / 5
Excellent Product
March 25, 2016

From: Virginia Age: Over 65 Gender: Male
Bought for the wifey. She LOVES them. Fit great. Very high quality
Runs
Small
Runs
Large
Very
Uncomfortable
Very
Comfortable
Very Low
Quality
Very High
Quality
5 / 5
jeans has lots of pockets
March 18, 2016

From: virginia Age: 45-54 Gender: Male
jeans look great and lots of pockets for tools and things
Runs
Small
Runs
Large
Very
Uncomfortable
Very
Comfortable
Very Low
Quality
Very High
Quality
5 / 5
Field tough but comfortable
February 18, 2016

From: Kansas Age: Over 65 Gender: Female
I bought these to wear when walking fields hunting pheasant or quail with my friends and husband. They fit great, are comfortable for all-day wear and they take the beating from briars and field grasses without me getting beat up.
Runs
Small
Runs
Large
Very
Uncomfortable
Very
Comfortable
Very Low
Quality
Very High
Quality
1 / 5
Why the change in design?!?
February 11, 2016

From: Underhill, VT Age: 35-44 Gender: Female
I bought two pairs of these pants to replace my worn out pairs and the new ones are awful! The fit has changed significantly and the waist is too high and very large. The pants say "Contoured waistband prevents gapping in the back", this is completely not true. From the hip the pants go straight up. There was a HUGE gap between my pants and my back. Also, the pockets are small and useless. These are not designer jeans, these are work pants. Why would the pockets be useless? They are still made from the thick durable fabric, but the fit is so terrible the pants had to be returned. I am so disappointed in these pants. The old style fit me perfectly.
Not
Durable
Very
Durable
Written by a customer while visiting Carhartt.com
1 / 5
WB 136 Knockouts Style #100681 Relaxed-Fit
December 10, 2015

From: Age: 55-64 Gender: Female
WB 136 is the winner. I am a fan of Carhartt . But not of #100681. I ordered 3 Pair of the #100681 when they did not have the WB 136 anymore. Needless to say I sent them back. Hopefully the WB 136 will be back in stock soon, have had #WB 136 Dungarees a while now, so as not to have an overexposure event. Nothing about the Style #100681 is up to the Standards of the WB 136. Quality of #00681 material does not come close to the quality of the WB 136, the WB 136 material is heavier. WB 136 - In cold weather blocked the wind, kept you warmer. WB 136 - In hot weather kept out the heat of the sun, no galls or chafing like with other pants. Pockets of #00681 are short and of no use. The WB 136 has deep useful pockets, carried all of my items, needed for the job at hand. WB 136 fit is fantastic, no gaps in waist, relaxed hip fit was great, bending, reaching. WB136 double front since material is heavier, allowed me to crawl around with no discomfort. The Style #00681 double front material not as heavy as I mentioned earlier. The fit of the Style #00681 did not even compare to the wonderful Fit of the WB 136. Style #00681 is uncomfortable in every way. Style WB 136 is a great fit all over. I always kept a pair to go to town in to do the storing in. Always lots of compliments on them. The rest I used for all kinds of outside work, from mud to rocks, mowing, weeding to stall work etc, including dodging briar bushes on the hills. The Style #00681 would not stand up to all of that. Please bring back the style WB 136 like it used to be with no changes in material or style. I depend on the Carhartt products, but not this Style #00681. Maybe Santa will whisper to Carhartt, to bring the WB 136 back under the Christmas Tree. What a wonderful gift that would be. Would you also consider on your womens shirts, tops, coats etc, to have them in Tall Length as well. Thank you
Not
Durable
Very
Durable
Written by a customer while visiting Carhartt.com
© 2016 Dungarees | Site Map | Terms of Use