WB 136 is the winner.
I am a fan of Carhartt . But not of #100681.
I ordered 3 Pair of the #100681 when they did not have the WB 136 anymore.
Needless to say I sent them back.
Hopefully the WB 136 will be back in stock soon, have had #WB 136 Dungarees a while now, so as not to have an overexposure event.
Nothing about the Style #100681 is up to the Standards of the WB 136.
Quality of #00681 material does not come close to the quality of the WB 136, the WB 136 material is heavier.
WB 136 - In cold weather blocked the wind, kept you warmer.
WB 136 - In hot weather kept out the heat of the sun, no galls or chafing like with other pants.
Pockets of #00681 are short and of no use. The WB 136 has deep useful pockets, carried all of my items, needed for the job at hand.
WB 136 fit is fantastic, no gaps in waist, relaxed hip fit was great, bending, reaching.
WB136 double front since material is heavier, allowed me to crawl around with no discomfort. The Style #00681 double front material not as heavy as I mentioned earlier.
The fit of the Style #00681 did not even compare to the wonderful Fit of the WB 136.
Style #00681 is uncomfortable in every way.
Style WB 136 is a great fit all over.
I always kept a pair to go to town in to do the storing in. Always lots of compliments on them.
The rest I used for all kinds of outside work, from mud to rocks, mowing, weeding to stall work etc, including dodging briar bushes on the hills. The Style #00681 would not stand up to all of that.
Please bring back the style WB 136 like it used to be with no changes in material or style.
I depend on the Carhartt products, but not this Style #00681.
Maybe Santa will whisper to Carhartt, to bring the WB 136 back under the Christmas Tree.
What a wonderful gift that would be.
Would you also consider on your womens shirts, tops, coats etc, to have them in Tall Length as well.