Free Shipping Over $55
Carhartt WB040
More Images (Click to Enlarge)

Carhartt WB040

Carhartt Women's Curvy-Fit Basic Jean

Reg Price: $44.00
Now: $34.99

Loading Selection...











Carhartt Logo

Our curvy-fit basic jean is specially shaped for comfort.

•  10.25-ounce (Black) or 10.5-ounce (Faded Blue Indigo), 99% cotton/1% spandex denim
•  Mid-rise sits slightly below the waist
•  Curvy fit through hip and thigh
•  Contoured waistband eliminates gapping in back, Boot-cut leg openings
•  Carhartt label sewn on right back pocket
•  ***REPLACES: WB014***
 
© 2013 Dungarees.net Site Map | Terms of Use
Women's Curvy-Fit Basic Jean (#WB040) 3.7 5 6 6
Best pair of pants that i have ever owned These are by far the best pair of pants that i have owned. This was my first time ever owning a pair of Carharrt's and i am more then pleased. I will be buying another pair very soon. They fit all the rights curves and they feel like they are already broken in, LOVE THEM!!! February 19, 2013
great fit Finally a great fitting pair of jeans for those of us with hips and a butt. These are the most confortable jeans I own. Love that they dont have the gap in the back January 7, 2012
LOVE THESE JEANS These are the most comfortable jeans i have ever purchased !! I can bend lift move but their snug in all the right places. I purchased one pair for work but had to return to buy another pair for work and 1 for going out. October 6, 2011
I sent mine back I buy Carhartt jeans in the loose fit, did not realize the difference in the fit. With this type, if you have a damaged knee that is larger then the other they will not go over the knee, very tight fit. very uncomfortable , Love to been able to wear them. January 7, 2013
Not the same pants? I purchased these jeans about a year and a half ago, and I'm disappointed to see that the quality isn't what it was then. The denim is thinner, instead of 7 belt loops there are now only 5, and instead of triple stitching on the inner inseam, they're only double-stitched. I hope they bring back the quality they had before. May 30, 2012
This is not a good pair of jeans! Worst pair of pants ever, shapeless, thin and it said 30 inch and was a lot longer than that, so disappointed especially for the money! March 16, 2013
1-6 of 6